96
3.6 Basic Fluorescence Microscopy Illumination Modes
Worked Case Example 3.1: TIRF Microscopy
Video-rate fluorescence microscopy was performed using objective lens TIRF on single
living Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells (“budding yeast”), spherical cells of mean diam
eter 5 μm, immobilized onto a glass coverslip in a low-fluorescence water-based growth
medium. An orange dye was used to stain the cell membrane that aligns its electric dipole
axis parallel to the hydrophobic tail of phospholipid groups in the membrane. The dye was
excited into fluorescence using a 561 nm wavelength 20 mW laser with Gaussian beam
profile of full width at half maximum 1.0 mm as it comes out of the laser head, which was
then expanded by a factor of 3 prior to propagating through a neutral density filter of
ND = 0.6 then through a +200 mm focal length lens 200 mm downstream of the back focal
plane of an objective lens of effective focal length +2 mm and NA 1.49, in between which
was positioned a dichroic mirror that reflected 90% of the laser light onto the sample, with
net transmission power losses from all lenses between the laser and the sample being
~20%. Initially, the angle of incidence of the laser was set at 0° relative with the normal of
the coverslip–water interface and was purely p-polarized. The focal plane was set to the
coverslip surface and a cell positioned to the center of the camera field of view, with the
measured intensity values on the camera detector at the center of the camera during con
tinuous illumination being [112, 108, 111, 114, 112, 109, 111, 112, 107, 110, 113] counts
per pixel measured using 10 consecutive image frames from the start of laser illumin
ation. Similar values were obtained in a separate experiment performed in the absence
of any dye.
a
Calculate the approximate mean intensity of the laser at the sample in units of
W cm−2. Comment on the results in regard to the dye and autofluorescence and esti
mate the camera readout noise.
b
The angle of incidence of the laser was then increased to the critical angle so that the
illumination was only just in TIRF mode. With the focal plane set again to the coverslip
surface and a new cell not previously exposed to the laser positioned to the center of
the camera field of view, the measured intensity values on the camera detector at the
center of the camera during continuous illumination were [411, 335, 274, 229, 199,
176, 154, 141, 133, 122, 118] counts per pixel. Comment on the difference with the
intensity data values of (a) and estimate the photobleach time of the dye under these
conditions.
c
The angle of incidence was then increased further to generate the thinnest evanes
cent field possible for TIRF excitation. Assuming the photon absorption of the dye is
not saturated, make a quantitative sketch of the variation in expected initial fluores
cence intensity per pixel if a 1D intensity profile is plotted parallel to the focal plane
through the center of the cell image.
Answers
a
The power incident on the sample after known attenuation and transmission
losses is given by
P =
×
×
×
−
(
) =
−
20
10
0 9
1 0 2
3 6
0 6.
.
.
. mW
The width w of the excitation field at the sample is given by
1 0
3
2 200
0 03
30
3 10 3
.
/
.
×
×(
) =
=
=
×
−
mm
m
cm
µ
For a rough approximation, the area of the excitation field is ~πw2. Therefore, the
mean excitation intensity in units of W cm−2 is
I
P
w
0
2
13
3 2
2
4 5 10
3 10
130
≈
=
×
(
)
×
×
(
)
(
) ≈
−
−
−
/
Wcm
π
π
.
/